Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Post More Singaporeans are staying single - 23-06-2010, 01:33 PM
More Singaporeans are staying single

Singapore’s resident Total Fertility Rate (TFR) fell to its lowest at 1.22 in 2009. This is in line with the general trend of higher singlehood rates and later marriages.

The "Population in Brief 2010" publication also noted that marriages between citizens and non—citizens have gone up.

Singaporeans are having fewer children. The National Population Secretariat said this might have to do with the global recession in late 2008.

It added that the impact was smaller compared to previous economic downturns.

This perhaps explains the lowest TFR of 1.22 last year.

The Chinese continued to have the lowest TFR followed by Indians and Malays.

The rate for Malays showed the most significant decline over the past decade.

The median age of citizen mothers at first birth increased from 28.6 years in 1999 to 29.6 years in 2009.

The decline was more pronounced among the younger cohorts aged 30—39 years.

Based on current trends, the National Population Secretariat said this group is less likely to achieve an average of two children by the time they reach 40—49 years old.

Overall, the fertility rates for the prime childbearing age of 20—34 years declined between 1999 and 2009.

The peak childbearing age group also shifted from 25—29 to 30—34 years.

The low TFR may also be due to more Singaporeans staying single.

Last year, of those aged 30 to 34, 42 per cent of men remained single, up from 33 percent ten years ago.

Likewise, 30 percent of women remained single compared to 22 percent in 1999.

Singlehood rates were the highest among males with below secondary educational qualifications and among females with university qualifications.

The secretariat added that those who marry are doing so later.

More are also marrying foreigners from around Asia.

The general marriage rate for male citizens dropped from 53 per 1,000 unmarried males in 1999 to 42 per 1,000 unmarried males in 2009.

Similarly, marriage rates for female citizens also fell from 56.0 to 38.2 over the same period.

The NPS said between 1999 and 2009, the median age of citizens at first marriage increased by one and a half years from 28.4 to 29.9 years for males, and from 25.9 to 27.4 years for females.

Proportionately, more Singaporeans are marrying non—citizens.

Such marriages increased by 10 per cent over the past decade from 31 per cent in 1999 to 41 per cent in 2009.

In particular, close to 80 per cent of such marriages were between Singapore men and foreign brides.

The majority of non—citizen spouses came from Asia, although non—citizen grooms came from more diverse regions.

Source - Channel NewsAsia


Comments:
This is hardly surprising. With economic progress and higher expectations among Singaporeans, the pursuit of a desired lifestyle is everything to most people. Women have equal opportunities in employment and no longer need the financial support of husbands. With such high costs of living in Singapore and greater opportunities for overseas work, the lure for a more vibrant, relaxed and tolerant lifestyle is too great to resist. And regarding the matter of more people marrying to foreigners, it's neither surprising too. Because Singaporean men are getting more and more violent, and they always ended up in divorce. It's common, too common. News about divorces or husbands beating up their wives are so common and often takes up 1/4 of the paper. So as time goes by, women will have this mindset that Singapore guys can't be trusted and of course would not entrust the rest of their lives with them. And therefore in contrast, they would believe that foreigners in Asian is better, for the aspect that they love their wives more. As the saying goes, "the grass is always greener on the other side". So why would not women be tempted to marry foreigns? Till Singapore guys learn how to really love Singapore woman.


Wendy.
http://forums.asiaone.com/showthread.php?t=30797

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

More job seekers refusing job offers: survey



SINGAPORE : Many Singapore employers are getting rejections from candidates whom they've made offers to, given the buoyant job market.

According to recruitment firm, Hudson, 40 per cent of employers in Singapore it surveyed said that candidates had declined offers of jobs made to them in the last six months. This is almost twice as many as the 21 per cent who said that they had not received any refusals at all in this period. And as hiring expectations continue to rise, workers will be spoilt for choice. Hudson's Executive GM, Georgie Chong, said this makes the recruitment process more challenging. "That good candidate in the current market is going to be very protected by the current employer. If you look at Europe and the US, the economic outlook there is still weak. Therefore, most of the growth is going to be piled into Asia. The budget for Asia is more aggressive compared to the headquarters," said Chong.

The single most important reason for refusing a job offer was the expectation of higher salaries. However, Chong pointed out that employers would be willing to meet these expectations for key positions. She added that companies may need to pay at least 20 per cent more to attract these candidates. Chong said: "In certain sectors, for example in banking, compliance roles for instance where we need very specialist knowledge or critical revenue generation positions, and faced with a very tight talent pool, candidates have an upper hand. "We've even offered candidates 30 - 40 per cent more but they still won't move because their employers come back with very aggressive counter measures." Such counter offers from the present employer are a significant issue, being mentioned by 38 per cent of employers in the survey.

The Hudson Report also indicated that many employers recognise they must increase salaries to retain top talent. Nearly half of respondents are prepared to offer increments of more than 10 per cent. Other reasons cited for turning down job offers include candidates having accepted job offers from other companies. In addition, the report showed that hiring expectations in Singapore are at their highest levels in nearly a decade.

57 per cent of respondents across all sectors forecast headcount growth in the third quarter. - CNA /ls



Comments:

With the increase in standard of living in Singapore, it is understandable that Singaporeans get more picky in choosing jobs. Spending over a few hundreds in a week is nothing fresh to Singaporeans anymore with exceptions to families with low income. I find it rather amusing for the job applicants to reject the jobs offered to them when they need a job. If not why apply for a job in the first place? According to the news report, the applicants rejected the job offers even though there was an increase in percentage of salary to attract the applicants to take up the job. These days, to acheive an increase in pay is not an easy thing with the economy being bad.

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Should smoking be banned in casinos?


ARTICLE : Casino patrons and employees alike are raising concern over the poor air quality in the smoking areas of local casinos at Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) and Marina Bay Sands (MBS).

The National Environment Agency (NEA) has received more than 30 complaints from patrons about poor air quality and gamblers lighting up in non-smoking areas.

“Most of the floors in MBS are smoking areas and after being in there for an hour or so, I start coughing and feeling uncomfortable,” 56-year-old patron Margaret Choi tells Yahoo! Singapore.

Another RWS patron Madam Lee Geok Lan, 70, also told The Straits Times that signages were poor in RWS’ casino and that she had trouble finding the non-smoking area.

It is not just the patrons who are disgruntled. Some dealers who work in the smoking areas of the casino are worried about the ill-effects of their long exposure to second-hand smoke.

An NEA spokesman acknowledges that there had been complaints about smoking violations when the casinos first opened, but claims the integrated resorts (IR) have since taken action including displaying “No Smoking” signs more clearly and reducing available entrances and exits in smoking areas.

The IRs, unlike other public places, have been left out of moves over the years to curb smoking indoors. They are allowed to draw up their own house rules on smoking and non-smoking areas. This is despite the ban against smoking in nightspots that took effect in July 2007 and the prohibition of lighting up within 5 metres of entrances of exits and buildings since January last year.

At RWS, more than 60% of the casino is smoke-free. However, at MBS, only one of the four floors is devoted to gambling for non-smoking patrons. As a result, casino employees are consistently exposed to second-hand smoke at work.

Richard Chua, 55, who recently visited MBS’ casino told Yahoo! Singapore, “Even though the second-hand smoke is not that big a deal for me since I only visit once in awhile, it can’t be healthy for those working there everyday.”

A typical shift for a dealer lasts eight hours, with workers getting a break every one to two hours. This adds up to almost six hours of smoke exposure a day. Working on a rostered basis, some may spend many days working in smoking areas before being posted to non-smoking ones.

Several casino staff have expressed unhappiness over having to breathe second-hand smoke for such long working hours everyday. While some have quit, others are putting up with the situation for fear of losing their jobs, and have not raised the matter to the management.

One MBS dealer told The Straits Times she had developed a lingering cough because of the second-hand smoke and said, “I was on medical leave three times within the first month of work.”

Others agreed, saying working in the smoking areas can be unbearable because the small gaming tables increases their proximity to surrounding smokers.

An MBS spokesman explains that ”all employees working in the casino were informed that their work environment will have smoking components.”

He adds that MBS is “committed to managing air flow and air quality” and that they have invested in air treatment and filtration systems similar to those used in hospitals.

RWS also told The Straits Times that it was “constantly monitoring and implementing ways to improve the air quality of the casino” to ensure patrons and workers are given a pleasant gaming and working environment.

The Ministry of Manpower, when asked if the issue of second-hand smoke came under the Workplace Safety and Health framework and what employees could do, said, “MOM encourages employees who have concerns about their work environment to raise them with their employers to work out practical solutions.”


Comment: Singapore, a clean and green environment , should ban smoking in the casino. Smoking in the casino has caused several problems and concern over on the poor quality of air in the casino itself. The smoker will not just affect the players that are around him but also affect the non-managerial employees working in the casino. Breathing in second-hand smoke has always been known to be more detrimental to health than first-hand smoke.
Furthermore, it affects not only the health of the players but also the performances of the players. Health is the most important factor to why we should ban smoking in the casino. It had been said," To reach a thousand steps, it is to take the first step", we must know that though banning smoking in the casino is just a step to ensuring a free-smoking environment in the casino but it is also a step making us closer to a free-smoking Singapore.
Done by: Hans

Sunday, June 13, 2010

HOME > BREAKING NEWS > SINGAPORE > STORY

Jun 8, 2010

MRT VANDALISM CASE

Staff thought it was artwork

The reason: Staff who spotted the graffiti thought it was an advertisement or artwork, and brushed it off. It was only when the train was called in for routine maintenance on May 19 that the alarm was raised, it said. -- PHOTO: YOUTUBE

AFTER almost a week of silence, train operator SMRT on Tuesday revealed the scale of the security breach at its Changi train depot.

For close to two whole days from May 17, it said in a statement on Tuesday, the company had no idea of the gaping hole in the perimeter fence at the depot, which consequently went unrepaired. And during this time, no staff member raised an alarm that a train had been vandalised.

The reason: Staff who spotted the graffiti thought it was an advertisement or artwork, and brushed it off. It was only when the train was called in for routine maintenance on May 19 that the alarm was raised, it said.

Police had earlier said that two men allegedly broke into the depot late on May 16 or in the early hours of May 17. One, Swiss national Oliver Fricker, 32, was charged with vandalism and trespassing. He is out on bail. His employer, Swiss company Comit AG, has also suspended him.

The other, believed to be Briton Lloyd Dane Alexander, is still at large. A warrant for his arrest has been issued.

In its statement on Tuesday, SMRT said its staff noticed the graffiti on the two train carriages on May 17, but thought nothing of it.



Comments: After reading this, I think that the Singapore government might be a little too over-reacting. Because I don't really think that this is considered vandalism because there's no vulgarities written on it. Although in Singapore, doing anything to the public properties is already considered vandalism, but the person who did it wasn't even a Singaporean. It's obvious that he din't know the laws of Singapore. Adding on, the graffiti he did was..nice. It wasn't ugly fugly, but artsy fartsy. I mean, why get so worked up? Yes you can charge him for trespassing, but, vandalism? Really? We should learn to relax, everyone.


WendyTang.

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_537320.html

Wednesday, June 02, 2010

Jun 2, 2010

Pursue dreams, give back

PM Lee's message of ensuring the continued success and survival of Singapore struck a chord with the students. -- ST PHOTO: LIM SIN THAI

TO GET pre-university students to think of the future, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday urged them to look to the past.

In particular, the contributions of Singapore's founding father Goh Keng Swee, who died last month at age 91.

Dr Goh's pivotal role in shaping Singapore into a success story was highlighted by PM Lee no less than four times during his 25-minute speech that sought to inspire his young audience to reflect on how their generation can contribute to the country and build on what they have inherited.

'I encourage you all to pursue your dreams, go for it.

'But wherever you are, whatever you are doing, please also remember your obligation to society, and make an effort to contribute back in some way,' he said at an annual seminar attended by about 500 students heading towards adulthood.

Mr Lee suggested two ways. One, do volunteer work, and the other, join the public service like Dr Goh did.


Comments : I think that what Mr Lee said is actually very true. "..pursue your dreams, go for it." Young people nowadays gives up whenever they faces an obstacle. Doing volunteer work has been scarce among youngsters nowadays because of their mindset or some find them troublesome. But have you ever thought that you'll actually feel good after doing something good? Like helping an old woman cross the road. This may be a simple act but you'll feel happy and so will the old lady. You don't have to be rich to do anything like this because sometimes money can't do as much as helping, literally. No matter what the world throws at you, just take it by the hand and you'll be able to conquer all the obstacles. Go for it; don't forget to remember your roots, though.


Wendy Tang.

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_534243.html